The Principal Consultant Up to £50k depending upon experience After 10 years of continued success and expansion, we’ve grown to the point where we need your help. In response, we’ve …read more
British Standard 5837:2012 tree surveys and tree constraints plan drawings are required for most planning applications where trees are on or adjacent to your site.
The way we answer these questions is fairly simple and the best way to explain how we do this, is to reverse engineer the process. Your local planning authority has a Tree Officer, who is normally responsible for weighing the council’s policies on tree management against your development ambitions and providing a decision recommendation (grant/refuse permission) to your Case Officer. He or she will use British Standard 5837:2012 to guide this decision.
Therefore, to ensure that this recommendation is favourable, we work with you to ensure that your scheme provides for a sensible tree removal/retention balance. That means demonstrating that you can retain and protect good quality trees on and adjacent to your site, while offering a considered and thorough justification for accepting the loss of those of lesser quality.
This stage of work is often required simply to validate your planning application, distinct from an arboricultural impact assessment, or method statement and protection plan, which are more often than not required at later design and planning stages, or as conditions of consent.
Uniquely, we employ an expert team of arboriculturists that are located throughout the country, so except in highly unusual circumstances, the only variable determining the cost of your survey is the number of trees you have. In the vast majority of instances, development sites have 100 trees or fewer and in response to this we developed a banded, easy to understand price structure for all of our BS5837 tree surveys: 1-20 trees, 21-50 trees and 51-100 trees; starting at just £349 plus VAT. Naturally, these prices are inclusive of our expenses. (If your site has >100 trees, just call us and we’ll get you a quote back within the hour.)
We have never a customer refused planning consent on the basis of (following) our advice, which is why we offer a 100%, no quibble, money back guarantee on all of our arboricultural survey and report services.
In the overview, we talked about your BS5837 (originally published in 1991, revised in 2005 and again in May of 2012) tree survey and constraints plan drawing being a ‘constraints exercise’, that is a function of our ‘tree quality assessment’. So exactly how is that quality assessed? Well, far from being arbitrary, this quality assessment (among many other things) is exactly what BS5837 seeks to standardise. Here’s how it works:
Your BS5837 tree survey is intended to inform your design team and local planning authority of the realistic constraints to your development presented by trees on and adjacent to your site, above and below ground. The survey is undertaken using a Trimble® Juno handheld (Global Positioning System) location device and PT Mapper Pro, which stores both the schedule data (such as a tree’s highlight, species, conditions, etc) and the spatial information, enabling us to plot your trees on to your Ordnance Survey tile or topographical survey.
Our tree constraints plan drawing will be produced and issued to you in AutoCAD and PDF formats, so that your design team or architect can overlay it onto their own plans an drawings. You will also receive an interpretive report that identifies the surveyor and site, defines much of the methodology of BS5837 and summarises the general nature and condition of the tree stock surveyed.
It looks something like this:
What do we require from you to do all of this? Not a lot..
Here’s one of our team, David Garrick, out and about in London..
Arbtech tree surveyor David Garrick at a site near Regent’s Park, London pic.twitter.com/jB7iOriEDz
— Arbtech (@SuperFastSurvey) April 3, 2014
BS5837 retention categories are arguably the most important piece of data to you and your designers. They are definitely something you want to pay close attention to. All trees that are on and adjacent to your site will have a BS5837 retention category, which is a function of a tree’s size, health/longevity and amenity contribution. The better quality the tree, the more of a constraint it presents to development, and vice versa. Here’s a really simplistic overview of the BS5837 retention categories:
Above we talked about BS5837 cat A and B trees needing proper consideration in your development scheme, in order to eliminate your planning risk. Part of that consideration is protecting the tree, both above and below ground. Above ground, the constraints are fairly clear and obvious; the canopy is visible for all to see. Protecting the canopy isn’t complicated, and can often be as simple as erecting a herras fence around the tree, with signage, so that plant and machinery do not damage it. So far so good.
Below ground, things are a little different. A little less tangible. The so-called ‘root protection area’ is a calculated functional minimum of rooting environment that (the authors of BS5837) consider the tree needs to sustain itself. Calculated, meaning – it’s a guess, but at least it’s a calculated one! The equation to compute the radius of the area when represented as a circle with the tree in the centre, is very simple – you take the diameter of the stem at 1.5m above ground level, and multiply it by 12. There are variations on this theme for multi-stemmed trees, but they are much of a muchness. So, if you have a tree that has a stem diameter of 0.5m, you need to avoid disturbing the ground around the tree up to 6m away from the stem. We say avoid, because there are instances where it is possible, with a little tenacity, to justify some incursion into that area, for example for car parking, or even foundations.
Why is all this necessary? Because roots, just like any other part of a tree, still need to respire at a cellular level and therefore require oxygen and gaseous exchange to take place, in order to survive. As the model in the picture below demonstrates, most of your trees’ roots are in the top 600mm of soil, and almost none of them go down more than a metre. For this reason, they spread out in a network over a very wide area and are sensitive to compaction (squeezing the air spaces out of the soil) as well as direct loss by cutting.
A couple more facts about root protection areas (RPA):
Over the years, we have perfected the art of reducing root protect areas drastically, by proving roots are not present, via a process known as ‘air spading’ – blasting a very high pressure jet of air at the ground to excavate a trench, say where you’d like to build up to, which has the effect of displacing the soil without damaging roots. This information can sometimes be vital as it can literally knock metres off an RPA’s radius. In some areas of London where the value of property is in the thousands of pounds per square foot, having one of our arboriculturists investigate a calculated (=theoretical) root protection area with an air spade to obtain an objective (=actual) root distribution, can pay for itself many times over, improving the profitability of your development. Of course, this can be a double edged sword, by actually confirming the tree survey and constraints plan’s indication of rooting volume on your site, but in the umpteen times we’ve used the air spade, it’s only happened a couple of times and frankly, since you’re no worse off than when you started, it’s use on contentious sites is a no-brainer.
Here’s a really short clip of Arbtech and the air spade in action:
The team at Arbtech were as efficient and professional as they were polite and courteous. My tree survey seemed a little daunting at first but ...Read More
Received report the in 24 hours! Fantastic service.
Why did I give you 5? I have never in my years as an architect called a consultancy desperate for a survey, to meet the ...Read More
Urgent Bat survey was required. we have arranged a site visit in the morning and received the Bat Survey report before 5 pm. This was ...Read More
Very considerate, valued service, very professional, Thank you.